Everyone’s a Private Client Now (Or Are They?)

How fintech is reshaping private banking: from exclusivity to accessibility

How fintech, embedded finance and hybrid models are redefining exclusivity in wealth management.

Introduction: The Rise of the Digital Affluent

For decades, private banking stood as a bastion of exclusivity reserved for the ultra-wealthy, built on personal relationships, bespoke services, and high thresholds of access. But as generational wealth shifts to digital natives, and fintech innovation reshapes expectations, a new question emerges: Can private banking become scalable and still preserve its trust-based essence?

New segments are emerging: freelance professionals with global income streams, crypto-native entrepreneurs, digital nomads, and tech founders with liquidity events in their 30s. These new affluent clients seek instant access, mobile-first experiences, values-based investing and a deeper sense of personal relevance.

This article explores the latest trends, paradoxes, and strategic responses shaping the evolution of wealth management in Europe and beyond.

The Opportunity: Democratizing Wealth Management

Technology has flattened the barriers of entry to investing. With just a smartphone and a few hundred euros, users today can access tools once reserved for HNWIs: automated portfolios, thematic ETFs, tax optimization, and even private markets exposure.

I’ve explored this topic several times in recent months and from different angles, but the context keeps evolving—faster and faster.

Just in the past week, Scalable Capital secured a banking license, enabling it to expand its service offering; Trade Republic announced a strategic shift from broker to wealth manager, with several new features set to launch in the coming months that echo the user experience of private banking; and Revolut—which has now become the fifth-largest bank in Italy by number of clients—is reportedly in talks with Allfunds to broaden its investment offering with mutual funds. A few months ago, BUX volved from zero-fee trading to offering J.P. Morgan-managed portfolios, a hybrid model for the next-gen mass affluent.

To this, we must add the steady advance of crypto exchanges into traditional asset classes, with Kraken being the latest to offer tokenized U.S. equities to European clients.

These moves signal a broader strategic realignment across wealthtech, a shift that is consistent with industry data:

  • The Capgemini World Wealth Report 2025 highlights that over $80 trillion will shift to Millennials and Gen Z in the next decade, fueling demand for hybrid, hyper-personalized, and impact-aligned investment solutions.
  • The UBS Global Wealth Report identifies a new class of “Everyday Millionaires” clients with €1–5M in investable assets who demand access, autonomy, and real-time visibility across portfolios.
  • Amundi’s Decoding Digital Investment 2025 shows that 77% of retail investors use digital platforms, yet 48% still value human support underscoring the need for tech-human synergy.
  • BlackRock (2025 Outlooks) reports a strong uptick in private markets allocations among emerging HNWIs and family offices, particularly in alternatives and infrastructure.

In Europe, over 40% of affluent professionals under 40 prefer a hybrid model of advisory that combines digital onboarding with human support in key financial decisions.

The Paradox: Scale vs Trust

The more accessible wealth management becomes, the more we confront a fundamental tension: is access enough to build trust?

Today’s platforms are designed to remove friction, compress steps, and accelerate onboarding. That’s great for scale but wealth is not a utility service. It’s personal, emotional, and often tied to moments of uncertainty: inheritance, retirement, children, crisis. In those moments, trust doesn’t come from the elegance of an interface but from a voice, a presence, a sense of being understood.

The paradox is this: while we’ve made tools easier to use, we haven’t made them easier to understand. Access does not equal comprehension. And without comprehension, autonomy becomes fragile.

The same goes for personalization. Algorithms are trained to tailor recommendations based on behavior, preferences, and demographics. But true personalization the kind that reflects values, fears, aspirations is deeply human. It comes from conversation, not calculation.

As platforms scale, the risk is clear: in chasing efficiency, they may erode the very trust that private banking was built upon.

Recognizing this paradox, the smartest players are not choosing between tech and people. They’re designing new models that combine both. Hybrid is no longer a compromise it’s the competitive edge.

Beyond the digitalization of processes and the redesign of user experiences, which nearly all players are pursuing there have been bolder attempts worth mentioning, though not all have been successful.

Some have tried to carve out a parallel positioning with new brands, sometimes through acquisitions; others are experimenting with entirely new experiences to differentiate themselves in a crowded market:

  • J.P. Morgan with its UK-based Chase and acquisition of Nutmeg; BBVA with its BBVA Next Gen, DBS Bank with Treasures Private Client and, it’s also worth mentioning the attempt that didn’t succeed, Goldman Sachs under the Marcus brand;
  • Azimut: The Italian group is innovating through its TNB (The New Banker) initiative, ;it’s one of the few to blend cultural shift with technology upgrade.

More broadly, many of the initiatives launched by incumbents have often lacked a truly holistic strategic vision. They appeared aimed at claiming space in the digital channel landscape, without embracing a deeper cultural shift, carefully keeping the highest value-added areas at a distance, in an attempt to preserve legacy positioning and protect existing profit pools.The challenge isn’t to pick sides between tradition and innovation, it’s to redesign value in a changing context. They’re about building a continuum where digital lowers the cost of access, and human advice raises the value of interaction.

In this sense, the new luxury isn’t exclusivity. It’s relevance. Relevance at scale, delivered with empathy, and shaped around real lives not just financial products.

The Architecture of the Future: Embedded, Personalized, Trusted

If the private banker of the past operated behind closed doors serving a select few in marble offices today’s platforms are rewriting the rules of access, interaction, and perceived value.

The wealth management experience is no longer bound to a bank branch, nor even to a bank app. It’s being woven into the daily life of users, embedded into platforms they already trust and use. From business banking to payroll services, from lifestyle apps to ecommerce platforms, wealth is becoming a background service ubiquitous, silent, and invisible.

Take Deel, the global payroll and HR platform, now integrating financial services for remote workers including savings, investing, and cross-border wealth tools. Or Klarna, the buy-now-pay-later giant, piloting investing features directly in its app. These moves show that investing is being abstracted from the traditional context making it ambient, not aspirational.

This trend brings clear benefits: frictionless onboarding, real-time relevance, and the ability to meet clients where they are. But it also poses an existential question for traditional private banking:

If access to portfolios, planning tools, and even advisory features becomes universally available what’s left of exclusivity?

Personalization is still a key differentiator but only if it’s truly human-centered. Advisors enhanced by AI can deliver scalable value, but meaningful advice still comes from listening, context, and shared understanding. Hybrid models are no longer optional they are the only way to compete with platforms that offer scale without intimacy.

In this future, the most valuable wealth platforms will not be those that offer the most features, but those that design trust, loyalty, and identity into every interaction.

This is the paradox of progress: as wealth services become more embedded and personalized, the role of trust architecture becomes more urgent not less.n

Conclusion: A Shift in Status, Not Just Access

“Everyone’s a Private Client Now” may be the new mantra but the real question is whether they’re being treated as such. The illusion of access without personalization or responsibility risks eroding trust instead of building it.

The players that succeed won’t be those who open the most doors, but those who design the best rooms.

Wealth is not just capital. It’s identity, values, and vision.

To serve the next generation of affluent clients, we need to build not just better portfolios but better platforms of trust.

How are you preparing for this evolution?


🧠 Read also:


Slow writing, fast thinking

Comments

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

it_ITItalian